We are providing many paragraphs, long essay in very simple language with the boundaries of different words here. Here you can find Essay on India's claim to the United Nations Security Council in English language for students in 1000 words. In this article cover Topic : Introduction of UNSC, Indian Government campaigns for reforming the Security Council, The position taken by the permanent members, The issues which are responsible as the roadblocks to India's permanent membership, Lack of democracy in the UNSC and India must modernise its military power to become at par with other super power.
United Nations Security Council or United Nations Security Council is one of six United Nations organization established under United Nations Charter. The primary purpose of the UN Security Council is to maintain international peace and security. It looks at matters related to disputes and settlements between countries. There are fifteen members in the United Nations Security Council, of which five are permanent and ten non-permanent members. The United States, United Kingdom, China, Russia and France are five permanent members. Ten non-permanent members are elected each year for a period of five to two years. In all these years the number of UN member countries has been quadrupled from 51 to 193. After the Cold War, members of the country are pursuing the expansion of the UN Council.
India is one of the founding members of the United Nations, but at that time it was in the British rule and economically backward class. With an improvement in its economic conditions, with the increase in GDP, India is getting permanent membership of the Security Council for a long time. A permanent member is expected to provide support to LINSC in all aspects to maintain international law and order. Although this does not mean that the member has to keep nuclear weapons, he must have a strong military trained in accordance with international standards. Improvement in UNSC membership should be supported by the United Nations General Assembly.
In order to pursue its membership, India has collaborated with Brazil, Japan and Germany to launch campaigns for a permanent seat in the UN. These countries decided to get a push through the resolution of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in 2005, which initially gained momentum but was later confused. This move was wasted as a result of several factors. Due to the lack of consensus among African countries in respect to their representative for the United Nations Security Council, there was no representation from the African continent. Stressful relations between China and Japan are another factor to withdraw the resolution. The Government of India is actively pursuing this matter during the UN General Assembly Meeting, the summit level talks and the visits of top global leaders and diplomats abroad. This effort bore fruit with about 200 members of the United Nations, in which the words of the document were agreed for the talks that were called for reform in the Security Council.
The UNGA has decided to start negotiations in the 70th UNGA session. After extensive consultation, the Framework Document was broadcast in 2015 to act as a solid foundation for the next stage of consultation. Various countries have presented written and detailed opinion, suggestions on issues such as regional representation, veto, categories of membership, work of the security council and their relations with the General Assembly. The major blow was from America, China, and Russia, which expressed its opinion with the framework of the document. This meant that these countries did not have much anxiety to accelerate the discussions
In fact, it was a setback for India, which always believed that these countries support it in one or the other form. Although the United States and Russia had claimed to stand by their verbal support for India's membership, there was no solid basis for it. France supported the involvement of India and other G4 (Brazil, Germany, India and Japan) countries along with a representative of Africa in the permanent council and supported the expansion of non-permanent members in the UN Security Council.
Many experts have claimed to make India's efforts worthless in terms of getting membership of the United Nations Security Council. But it is important that with all other members of the United Nations, India should be more innovative in bidding its proposals. In the bid to return the permanent seat, the G-4 countries have signed an agreement on Veto power, for which the claims of 15 years or more will be suspended.
India's position on the Non-Progress Treaty and border disputes with China and Pakistan are considered as obstacles for their permanent membership. Indo-US nuclear deal was compelled to recognize India's nuclear position, but India's entry into non-NPT status, the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and the Missile Technology Control Act (MTCR) Working as a major obstacle
It is a permanent member of the UN, who has the power to handle international security issues. The lack of democracy in the United Nations Security Council has a direct impact on multilateral relations. In the past, the United Nations Security Council was unable to handle issues of Libya and Syria effectively.
If meaningful improvements are made in the UNSC, they will be useful in addressing the global challenges.
India's economy is rapidly developing and playing an important role in international affairs. India's claim for permanent membership is justified by the fact that the Indian Army is the biggest contributor to the mission of maintaining peace in the whole world of the United Nations. Apart from this, India's foreign policy tells about its ideology of world peace.
As a member of the United Nations Security Council, it will be able to contribute in a better way for global concerns. Apart from this, achieving the developing countries on the board will help the UNSC better understand and hand over issues related to these economies. Although the path to the permanent seat in the UN Security Council is not easy, the efforts should be continued from the end of India to further this deal.
To conclude, we should look at some facts before we claim a seat as a permanent member of the UN Security Council. When the United Nations was formed, the permanent members were able to demonstrate strong, economically vibrant and international influences (in militant sense) on the basis of their creatures. None of these criteria were found during India, 1940.
But still India is not powerful enough, its economy is not close to being like other permanent members, and simply connecting another country (and thus adding another veto) will make things very complicated. In order to provide and maintain a fixed level of consistency and to maintain and maintain and display, there is always a priority for choosing economically developing countries, which is the standard of life, life expectancy, generally health, education etc. According to the level, the more developed. Apart from this, India should modernize its army so that the UN Security Council can be equivalent to the military of other super powers to claim a permanent seat.