Print Document or Download PDF

Essay on Euthanasia - Should it be Legal?

Feed by sandy Cat- Essay

We are providing many paragraphs, long essay in very simple language with the boundaries of different words here.  Here you can find Essay on Euthanasia - Should it be legal? in English language for students in 1000 words. In this article cover Topic : Meaning of euthanasia, Difference between suicide and euthanasia, Euthanasia is allowed in some countries, In India passive euthanasia is allowed only in exceptional cases, The process should be followed in passive euthanasia, Arguments in favour or against euthanasia and The decision to euthanasia should be collective.

The word euthanasia comes from the Greek word 'euthanatos', which means 'good death' is the act or practice of ending the life of a person or someone suffering from terminal illness. It is also known as 'Mercy Murder', which is an act where there is no possibility of a person to survive because he is suffering from a painful life, ending his life in a painless way, it is a gentle Is easy and painless death.

This is to bring about the death of a fundamentally ill patient or disabled person. Eethanasia is thus practiced so that one person can die with alcohol as well as living.

There are two types of euthanasia, i.e. active euthanasia and passive ethncia. Active benignity or positive euthanasia means the direct interference is the reason for the intentional death of a person. Direct action is taken to eliminate this useless life and meaningless existence. Like giving a deadly dose of a drug or by giving dangerous injections

On the other hand, passive euthanasia or negative euthanasia deliberately causes death due to necessary, necessary and general care or not providing food and water. It means to close, remove, or remove the artificial life support system. Passive euthanasia is generally more inconvenient than slow and active.

Before moving forward, it is important to note that there is a difference between 'suicide' and 'ethnia'. In one suicide, a person voluntarily kills himself with blood, poison or any other means.

This is a deliberate task to kill themselves due to depression or other reasons. On the other hand, euthanasia is the action of a person who does this to eliminate another person's life.

Another major difference between studying is 'supportive suicide' and 'youthia'. Assisted suicide is an act that deliberately helps one to commit suicide, eg. By providing a means to do this

When it is a doctor who helps the patient kill himself by providing a recipe for deadly drugs, then it is a 'doctor-assisted suicide'

On the other hand, euthanasia may become active, such as a physician gives fatal injections to the patient or when a doctor removes the patient's life support system.

Now, the issue of concern is the legalization of the Sunnah. Ethnians active in countries like Belgium, Netherlands and Switzerland are legal. Passive euthanasia is allowed in the UK, USA and Canada, in India, in the state of Maharashtra, there is a question of legalization of life forever in the case of Maruti Mrs. Desai.

After the decision of 2011 in the Aruna Shanbag case of the Supreme Court, as a result of sexual harassment, a nurse living in the vegetable state for the last 37 years, on 7th December 2011, in exceptional cases, 'Passive Ethnians' allowed medical experts after review, while experts 'Active euthanasia' is not allowed. Aruna's condition forced the court to consider passive euthanasia. This historic decision was passed to passive euthanasia, thousands of patients living in a continuous vegetation state across the country, the right of artificial life support system was withdrawn so that they could be able to end the life of grief.

The court said that there is no right to die under Article 21 of the Constitution, but due to the death of a person, permanent permanent vegetation is in the state, there is no possibility of recovery from withdrawing artificial life support, this is not a positive work. Kill ' The bench of Justice Markandey Katju and Gyan Sudha Mishra reiterated this 'passive ethanosias' and said that it can be allowed on a case-by-case basis.

The court also set guidelines for passive euthanasia as if the matter should be sent to the High Court for decision and should be one of the petitioners to withdraw the patient's parents or husband or wife life support system.

  • A special bi-judicial bench will be constituted in each High Court, which will decide the applications for seeking permission for euthanasia.
  • A committee of three prestigious doctors of the panel constituted by the High Court in consultation with the State Government will examine the patient and submit their report in the back of the High Court.
  • Notices will be issued to all concerned people related to the doctor's report.
  • After listening to all, the bench will give its verdict, this matter should be dealt with promptly as the delay pulls out the pain of the patient.

Although the Supreme Court had given the decision to allow certain ethnicities, yet there is a debate whether to make Yishmritas legal or not. Those who want to make euthanasia valid, there are some reasons given by them.

  • It provides a way to overcome a person's unbearable pain and suffering.
  • There is a provision of living with dignity in Article 21 of the Constitution, and if the standard is falling below that minimum level then a person should be given the right to terminate his life.
  • It not only provides relief to unbearable pain of one patient but also provides respite to relatives of a patient with mental illness.
  • It provides a way to overcome a person's unbearable pain and suffering.

On the other hand, many people are against legalization of euthanasia. They give the following arguments

  • Human life is a gift from God and life is wrong and immoral humans can not be given the right to play God's part.
  • As a substitute, euthanasia can have harmful effects on acceptable social interests and physician-patient relationships.
  • Miracles happen when it is a matter of life and death, examples of patients coming after these years are examples.
  • It is feared that if euthanasia is valid, then other groups of more vulnerable people will become in danger of feeling themselves in taking that option.

To conclude, we can say that now it has been felt that this method has no effect of unbearable pain and suffering, but it can definitely lead to crime, if it does not properly monitor . As far as possible, efforts should be made to reduce the pain and suffering through treatment, ie both physical and mental. Ethniansia should be supported, when all other options will end.

The decision should be a collective, based on the consent of the doctors and the closest relatives of the patient. After all, the right to live will not be complete if the right to die with full respect is not available to any person.

Read More.


Go Back