Print Document or Download PDF

Essay on Independence Expression vs Nationalism

Feed by sandy Cat- Essay

We are providing many paragraphs, long essay in very simple language with the boundaries of different words here.  Here you can find Essay on Independence Expression vs Nationalism in English language for banking students or other in 1000 words. In this article cover Topic : Define the concept of freedom of speech, The meaning of the term nationalism, Freedom of speech has emerged gradually, Importance of freedom of speech, The concept of nationalism, Debate between freedom of speech and nationalism, Different incidents fuelled up the debate and Freedom of speech and nationalism can co-exist, not mutually exclusive.

Freedom of speech is a major pillar of an independent government; When this aid is removed, the constitution of a free society is dissolved and torture occurs on its ruins. Freedom of speech and expression, every person has the right to express their opinions, thoughts and thoughts on any topic, without fear of harassment or censorship by the state. Article 19 provides for the freedom of speech and expression in the Indian Constitution.

Nationalism, on the other hand described by the Merriam Webster Dictionary, is "a feeling that people often believe in their country and take pride in them that it is better and more important than other countries" or "big desire is the same To make groups of people who share culture, history, language etc., to create a separate and independent nation of their own. "For the ideas between right groups and the rest The recent debate took place in India on the freedom of speech and expression vs nationalism due to the misery. The line between nationalism and jingoism is often blurred, thus, they trample the speech and freedom of speech.

Gradually emerging concept during European cognition 'Freedom of speech' England's Bill of Rights (1698) gave 'freedom of speech on parliament'. This concept has also been inspired in 1789 by the declaration of human rights and civilizations adopted during the French Revolution. In India, in 1919, the Rowlatt Act gave broad powers to the British government and police, such as restrictions on public meetings such as personal rights and freedoms, censorship of media and publications etc. The public's opposition to this act was inspired by Mahatma Gandhi for the non-violent civil disobedience movement in the whole country. Here the freedom of expression becomes the main issue of nationalism; Universal Declaration Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Convenience on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) guarantee the right to freedom of speech and expression. The authority in this sense is important that it also facilitates the fulfillment of other human rights.

Freedom of expression applies at two levels, at the individual and state level. At the person level, through the exchange of ideas and information from the freedom of expression, it can be understood around and the whole world. People are able to express their opinions independently of these rights and they are protected and ensured by the state. On the other hand, from the perspective of a state, the freedom of speech becomes absolutely important for the social, economic and political advancement of the nation.

This right enables honesty, people to administer in every field of politics, bureaucracy, judiciary, media etc. It promotes citizens to keep citizens continuously under these checks. The result is good governance, it promotes public debate and discusses policies, laws and state functions. It helps public forums to become a market place of ideas. Similarly, it also enables the implementation of human rights. Highlighting the public inquiry of media and human rights, commissioned by the state and the lapse. Expression of an expression in these two perspectives is very fundamental to realizing the full potential of freedom and humanity. However, it has been said, "Rights are in line with responsibilities." Article 19 (1) of the Indian Constitution describes the freedom of speech and expression. Article 19 (2) describes the appropriate restrictions on this scope that state security, friendly relations with other countries, public order and civilization, court contempt, defamation, involvement of crime, sovereignty and integrity of India

On the other hand, nationalism, a modern concept, is an adhesive that keeps members of a particular area to identify themselves as a unit. It is the view of historians that it emerged in the 19th century, thus considered as a modern concept, it is a modernization concept because it facilitates development and development. The state intervenes with its various organs to ensure the welfare of its citizens. In this process, citizens of the state create a sense of solidarity. Binding powers are our freedom fight, culture, language etc. These forces make us feel proud for our country.

However, more often it has been seen that in this state of nationalism and pride the state members have become very nationalist, inadequate value of tolerance for others is the result of violation of their consequences. The debate between JNU's recent case, independence speech and nationalism was highlighted. In JNU, there was an incident in 2016, where chimes were made, but provoked nationalist sentiments due to being vivid. It was a gathering where the students had assembled to condemn the death sentence given to Afzal Guru. However, some elements of the crowd called for a junk against India, which called for dissolution. Due to three reasons, this issue was blown up by proportion. One, chimes with elements in the House against India Two, the police need and wrong statement of facts in front of the public. Three, media scrutiny and promotion that was made.

The police expelled more students on the charges that went ahead. In addition, they were heralded in the court premises in front of the camera. These events stressed the debate of freedom of speech and expression versus nationalism. In another assembly in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly in 2016, a member was compelled to chant a special slogan. In India, members of a particular community do not always need to show their loyalty to the nation by shouting a special slogan. Includes the right to be silent in freedom of speech and expression. Forcing someone to say this is a violation of this right. Apart from this, nationalism does not appear just by shouting a special slogan. We follow the principles of our constitution which is nationalism.

Similarly, when the pot was already boiling, the issue of the National Institute of Technology (NIT), Srinagar was raised. When India was defeated by West Indies in the T-20 World Cup in 2016, NIT students were divided for them and against India. Local students did Jaipur for the West Indies and non-local people who came out of the locality on campus for India. This issue has assumed new dimensions, because it is linked to the political issue of separation of Kashmir from India. Security in the premises has been increased and it has worsened even more by presenting a picture of the war zone.

The issue was again debating the nationalism speech and freedom of expression. Freedom of speech is essential for our society. It is a powerful tool for all civil and democratic nations of the world. Without this our literature, science, art and music can not flourish. But the right to freedom of speech is not absolute. It is bound by our social duty and moral obligation. Considering other sensitivity, it should be used with caution; Otherwise it misuses your application

Freedom of speech and expression and nationalism can be united. They are not mutually exclusive. However, red lines on both sides have been prepared. Jingwad or ultra nationalism should not suppress speech and freedom of speech. Likewise, freedom of speech is banned, it must be mandatory to follow and express slogan for the destruction of India. We can conclude by citing Pope John Paul II: "Extensive nationalism is related to many attacks and an aggression on humans today, which does not save anyone. The challenge that is already with us is accepted as reality. The practice of doing is only a new form of slavery. "

Read More.

Go Back