Print Document or Download PDF

Essay on Iraq After Saddam - 1900 Words

Feed by Manisha Cat- Essay

Essay in very simple language with the boundaries of different words here. Here you can find Essay on Iraq After Saddam in English language for 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and banking or other competitive exams students in 1900 words.

More than a year has passed since the fall of the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. When Saddam's idol fell, it was a moment of American victory. Three grand objectives were completed within a short period of three weeks. First of all, the threat of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction was over. Second, it is likely that Al-Qaeda will create a strategic link. A new sanctuary was obtained along with dictator Saddam Hussein and in Iraq. Third, people suffering from long-term blood thirst were freed from the dictator's shoe.

It was hoped that life would be stable and stable and the world would see the end of history. A democratic modern secular, Iraq will soon become a beacon for other countries of West Asia. Terrorism will still be deprived of soil, which has so far been nurtured.

Today all the expectations have become confusing themselves. The fear of an imminent link between Saddam and Al-Qaeda has also emerged as a product of a reflector. Except Ansar ul-Islam Bass in Iraq-controlled territory in far north, there were no al-Qaida base or cadre in Iraq. Instead, it is an invasion of Iraq that has brought Al-Qaeda and made it capable of plowing firmly in Iraq. Its increasing presence can be assessed by the increasing frequency of signature form of attack - suicide bomb.

America's mistake was thinking that it could attack a country, kill thousands of people and can not resist violent resistance in its new subjects. Rebellion spreading in Iraq and the connection between Sunni and Shias in this proves that it was so self-deceptive illusion.

Prior to attacking Iraq, Bush, Chancelli and Rumsfeld did not only assure Americans but invading forces that they would be greeted as invaders but not as invaders. The soldiers selling Basra, Najaf and Nasiria Hadi hoped to encourage crowds and garlands. They met instead of rockets and tablets. The United States blamed them on Fedyin, a word that had been heard by Ba'Ha's fanatics and the Ladders of Saddam, no one in Iraq's context.

After literally shooting the personnel of the US Army, the Alliance's Provisional Authority (CPA) was stuck in this version of the incidents and forced to compel the casualties to reduce the casualties, so that they proceeded only in armed convoys. During the news of Uday and Kusu's death, Saddam's sons were congratulated in a 30-minute rifle fire in Baghdad, the CPA told the world that it was an expression of happiness and estimated sharp reduction in guerrilla attacks in the coming weeks. Was installed. When the opposite happened, there was nothing to comment and interpret. After capturing Saddam on December 16, 2003, the CPA hopes to resuscitate. Instead, attacks on Americans increased more focus and fatality.

It is a fact that Saddam's dislikes could not be liked for the attacking force and then America became a victim of its propaganda.

Iraq's new democracy was not to be a federal, secular, pro-American and at least anti-Israeli. Only one Iraqi group has met these requirements, the Iraq National Congress is headed by Ahmad Ahmad Chalabi. This is the reason why CPA Chief Joe Garner first increased the size of the real situation in Iraq and offered a very quick election to return the Iraqis back to power, they were really kicked in hours. Today the gerrymandered 'constitution that the United States wants to be imposed on Iraq and the so-called transitional government will make it, rejects universally.

Similarities between what is happening in Iraq and Vietnam are marked more frequently every day. For America, it is very difficult to get out of Iraq without losing all its claims of world domination. Al Qaeda has made it clear that all crusaders should be evacuated, whatever their intentions may be.

Since terrorist violence continues in Iraq, the path to self-rule will be challenging, but progress is also effective. The Iraqi Governing Council unanimously signed the Interim Constitution. It guarantees freedom of religion and expression; Right to gather and organize political parties; The right to vote and light for a fair, fast and open trial. It restricts gender, nationality and religion as well as discrimination on the basis of arbitrary arrest and custody. A year ago, no one could imagine such a security.

The withdrawal of US forces from Iraq:

There is a difference of opinion on the top of the US military over Iraq's occupation, with some senior officials, the United States is facing casualties for years without achieving its target of establishing a free and democratic Iraq.

His big concern is that the United States is military prevalent but has failed to support the Iraqis. This idea is spreading universally but rapidly and is being promoted for the first time.

Major General Charles Swanak, Commander of the 82nd Airborne Division spent most of his time in western Iraq, he said, "He believes that the US Army is still winning, where the fight takes place at the tactical level," but when asked The United States is losing, they said, "I think strategically, we are Colonel, Paul Hughes, where last year the strategic plan for the right to occupy American occupation in Baghdad Was the first director, he said, "he agrees with that idea and noticed that a pattern of winning the battle during losing a war is characteristic of American failure in Vietnam. I lost my brother in Vietnam, "said Hughes, who is still involved in preparing Iraq policy, 'I promised myself that when I came to active duty, I would have to stop it from happening again After 30 years I am thinking that we will win every fight and the battle will be lost, because we do not understand the war in which we are. "

Prisoner abuse scandal and continuous car bombing and American casualties create an image of a military which is not effective in counter rebellion. "

Some US leaders, especially the economic rebuilding and Sunni Muslims, want to increase the progress of Rajundari to stand around the city of Patanua and to increase cooperation with Shia Muslims in separating the radical Shia clerk Muktada al-Sadar. Some people believe that in order to give limited sovereignty on the views of the Iraqi government, it is responsible for fighting a lot of war in May and June as of June 30. A year after President Bush announced victory over Iraqi strategy, a year after announcing a victory over Iraq, a few years later, some Iraqis felt less secure in Iraq and in reality what really created uncertainty After 30 years the country will run.

Both inside and outside the Armed Forces, experts are generally debating that the US military should be there, but its approach should be changed. Some people argue for more soldiers, others less, but they generally agree to amend the goals of the United States to make less ambitious. A senior Pentagon official said that he believes the United States is on the road to defeat. "It is doubtful that we can go this way for a long time, they said," Americans can not stand for it - and they should not be asked who was guilty, it will be the General Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Defense Paul was directly pointing to Wolfowitz.

They said, "I do not believe we had a clearly defined war strategy ... and we got out of the strategy before starting the attack." "If any person like Kyle Powell was the chairman (joint Chief of Staff), then he would not have agreed to send a soldier without a clear exit strategy. The present SOD (Defense Secretary's Office) refused to listen to or listen to the army Given advice. "

The Pentagon's No. 2 official Wolfowitz said that he does not think the United States is losing in Iraq, and that no senior official has thought of it. "I'm sure there are some things" who think, they said, spend yesterday. Wolfowitz said, "There is no question that we have to face some difficulties." "I do not mean to give a voice to Polinina - do we all know that we have to face a difficult problem." But, he said, "I think the course we have set is correct, which is moving ahead as soon as possible for Iraqi self-government and Iraqi self-defense."

That strategic objective of an independent and democratic Iraq is grand. Instead, it has been speculated that if the Bush administration wins the election again, it will just settle for a stable Iraq, perhaps it could be run by the former Iraqi generals.

The idea that Iraq could be miraculously and quickly changed into a brilliant example of democracy, which would 'transform' the Middle East, as the need for much fairy dust and cultural ego to believe in. Some people stop fighting the separatist tendencies between the three major groups of Iraq-Shia, Sunni and Kurds to the United States and instead embrace them. Former Croatian diplomat Peter Gallbrith wrote last month, "The best hope for keeping Iraq together and avoiding civil war is the fact that every possible component is possible to make every possible system possible," Croatia, every month Former US ambassador Peter Galbriath wrote.

Under the United States or other international body, the US-led Business Authority will allow free and clear elections for the National Assembly over the next few months. They will accept the election results even if it is an anti-American majority. In the meantime, the US will prepare Iraqi security forces, but the interim government will start a military comeback once working. And Washington will continue to provide funding for the rebuilding of Iraq, unless new Iraqi officials generally follow their democratic origin, but American occupation should not end until Iraq is stagnant Because the results will be ensured by the United States by chaos and violence. It is important to keep in mind that till the end of foreign stability, there can not be any stability until it becomes clear from instability and violence. Another fear is that the anti-American "extremists" will disrupt the election for the National Assembly. But if such Iraqis really have to go to America, then they will support an electoral process that gives rise to the American withdrawal.

Whatever is the political or economic consequences, the only way for America to remember and this is the last chance to remember as liberators, gradually withdrawing it. President Bush promised Iraqi people and the international community that our military victory will make Iraq a peaceful, democratic state, a model for its neighbors and a stronghold against terrorism. Resistance movement has reduced the expectations of America and it is believed to be an enemy occupation.

To keep the Iraqi state in order to implement the Iraqi state, it should remove the money and swallow its dissent and control the control. One year $ 10 (£ 5.6 billion) will buy more counter-terrorism cooperation than a military occupation which spends five times more. America is facing two important issues in Iraq. Firstly, the international community needs to support the security of the new Iraqi government after 30 June and to rebuild the country's infrastructure and economy. The United States has declared the principles of democracy and self-sufficiency, and now it is necessary to follow whatever the results are relevant in accordance with the conservation of basic international human rights.

Iraq has become a mess for America and America, looking for a way to honorably withdraw from Iraq. The US and the armed forces are also very displeased. Let's see what will happen there.

Read More.


Go Back